<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Darwin, Then and Now &#187; haemoglobin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/tag/haemoglobin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darwinthenandnow.com</link>
	<description>The Most Amazing Story in the History of Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Origin of &#8216;T. rex&#8217; Protein Questioned</title>
		<link>http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/2009/07/origin-of-t-rex-protein-questioned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/2009/07/origin-of-t-rex-protein-questioned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard William Nelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History of Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haemoglobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missing link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T. rex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now a long-time critic has called for an independent review of the 2007 studies of ancient protein from a fossilized Tyrannosaurus rex after fresh analysis revealed traces of ostrich haemoglobin in the original samples.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/T.-Rex.bmp"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-167" title="T. Rex" src="http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/T.-Rex.bmp" alt="T. Rex" /></a>According to the February 27<sup>th</sup> edition of <em>Nature</em>, more doubts now cloud the claim that dinosaur protein has been sequenced. Now a long-time critic has called for an independent review of the 2007 studies of ancient protein from a fossilized <em>Tyrannosaurus rex </em>after fresh analysis revealed traces of ostrich haemoglobin in the original samples.</p>
<p>In the contentious papers, researchers identified seven fragments from a protein called collagen, found in connective tissue, and said their sequences most closely matched the chicken version of the protein. The samples came from the fossilized femur of a <em>T. Rex</em>. As well as further strengthening the evidence for the link between dinosaurs and birds, the findings would make the protein the oldest ever to be sequenced. The work, published in <em>Science</em>, garnered headlines worldwide and met with considerable scepticism at the time, for good reason—fraud.</p>
<p>The hunt for Darwin’s “inconceivably great” missing links continues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/2009/07/origin-of-t-rex-protein-questioned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

