Evolution, Not What They Once Said

Evolution, Not What They Once Said

The armored dinosaur fossil preserved in exquisite detail unearthed in a western Canadian oil sand mine highlights the new daunting challenges facing the theory of evolution. This stunningly preserved fossil is shattering long-standing paradigms. “The more I look at it,” said Michael Greshko science writer for National Geographic, “the more mind-boggling it becomes.”

Caleb Brown (picture-right), a paleobiologist at the Royal Tyrrell Museum where the fossil was placed on exhibit in August, explained to Greshko, “We don’t just have a skeleton… We have a dinosaur as it would have been.” The museum is host to one of the largest dinosaur collections in the world. Now the fossil, known as Borealopelta markmitchelli (pictured), has the evolution industry struggling to place a new species in the mythical world of biological evolution, not what they once said it should be.

Red Deer Valley

Oil sand heavy-equipment operator, Shawn Funk (pictured-left), early in the afternoon of March 2011, was shoveling his way through the oil sands of Millennium Mine in Alberta, Canada, operated by Suncor. Recognized now as one of the largest petroleum reserves in the world, the area emerged as a massive final resting place for the remnants of ancient marine plants and creatures overwhelmed during the Earth’s global flood.

After spotting a glimpse of an unexpected lump in his shovel-load of material, Funk immediately shut down his enormous workhorse. Together with his supervisor, Michel Gratton, they immediately sent photos of their finding to the Royal Tyrrell Museum in Drumheller, Alberta. The excitement captivated Suncor.

Drumheller lies in the Red Deer River valley on the northeast of Calgary where, according to Donald Henderson, curator at the museum, “We’ve never found a dinosaur in this location.” But, that was going to change.

Fascinated with the photos, the museum sent a team to investigate. Two days later, expecting to find fossilized bones of a marine reptile, the museum team quickly realized something extraordinarily unexpected had been uncovered: a non-marine monster – a dinosaur, of some sort.

“All the mine staff from every level and department,” Henderson reported in The Guardian, “were tripping over themselves offering help.” After receiving three days of intensive training, the newly formed Suncor extraction team began the tedious fossil rock liberating process.

After a nearly disastrous two-weeks of dust and diesel exhaust, the team successfully extracted a 15,000-pound rock containing the mega-fossil. Working in 12-hour shifts, the endeavor was caught on camera. Plaster-wrapped and hoisted onto a truck bed, the treasure-laden rock was finally sent on its 420-mile museum-bound journey to Alberta.

Paleontologist Mark Mitchell (pictured-left) at the museum, was entrusted with the project of stripping away the hard-set sediments at the museum from the fossil. Extricating the skull alone took nearly eight months. In total, after more than 7,000 hours of chipping-away over nearly six years, the an 18-foot-long dinosaur fossil weighing nearly 3,000 pounds was finally ready to be open to the public.

 Bottom of the Sea

Dubbed the “four legged tank” with two 20-inch long spikes protruding from the shoulders, the “body was submerged at the bottom of the sea,” explained Daniel Uria writing for UPI news. How a terrestrial monster could have ended-up at the bottom of the sea quickly emerged as an issue.

“Finding the remains of an armored dinosaur that was washed far out to sea was huge surprise,” said Henderson in an interview with Blake de Pastino writing for Western Digs. Science writer Ed Yong writing for The Atlantic speculated –

“Somehow, this particular individual ended up at sea. Perhaps it got careless on a shoreline. Perhaps it drowned in a flood and was washed out to sea.”

Struggling with the issue, Greshko (pictured-left) advanced essentially the same theory –

“This armored plant-eater lumbered through what is now western Canada, until a flooded river swept it into open sea.”

After speaking with the museum paleontologists, Cecile Borkhataria and Tim Collins, writing for Britain’s popular Daily Mail, reiterated the now unavoidable flood theory –

“The researchers believe that the dinosaur lumbered through what is now western Canada, until a flooded river swept it into open sea.”

The Deer River Valley oil sands, however, are located on the eastern slopes of the Canadian Rockies. That’s a problem. In the absence of a massive global flood event, since the oil sands are far from any large body of water, the theory does notexplain how a terrestrial dinosaur could somehow end-up in some unknown long-gone sea.

The pristine fossil record evidence from Borealopelta markmitchelli, rather than pointing to Darwin’s theory of “slight, successive” incremental changes over long periods of time, points to a near instantaneous massive global flood phenomenon. Evolution, not what they once said it should be.

Like A Statue

“It’s an animal so well preserved that its skeleton can’t be seen for the skin and soft tissues that still cover it,” explains science writer Ed Yong (pictured-left), writing for The Atlantic, in the article entitled “A dinosaur so well preserved, it looks like a statue.”

CNN writer, Matt Rehbein’s article “Shocking lifelike dinosaur fossil makes public debut,” agrees with Yong,

“The sleeping giant you see when you look at it is astounding. For one thing, you don’t see bones; most of the skeleton is undetectable because it’s covered in fossilized skin and, as the museum describes it, ‘encased in intact body armor.’”

Fossilization of the armored dinosaur happened quickly – not over a long period of time. According to Yong

“The dead dinosaur sank and hit the ocean floor hard enough to leave a small crater. Before sharks had a chance to nibble it, or worms had a chance to bury into its bones, it was quickly smothered by fine sediment and sealed off from the outside world.”

“Normally when we find dinosaur fossils we just have a skeleton, the bones. And we have to use our imaginations to reconstruct what they look like,” explained Caleb Brown in an interview with The Guardian, a British publication. Brown continued,

“In this case, we’re very lucky in that it’s not just the bones; we have all of the armour, the osteoderm is preserved, we also have all the skin preserved and it is in three dimensions.”

Contrary to the evolution industry’s once popular foundational theory of uniformitarianism, fossils do not develop over long periods of time – as illustrated by Canada’s Red Deer River armored dinosaur. Darwin was wrong about fossilization. Evolution, not what they said it should be.

Exquisite Coloration

The official scientific report describing the fossil was finally published this year in the journal of Current Biology; entitled,

“An Exceptionally Preserved Three-Dimensional Armored Dinosaur Reveals Insights into Coloration and Cretaceous Predator-Prey Dynamics.”

Not only was the dinosaur fossil covered with skin (pictured-left), the preserved soft tissues were found to even have fragile biomolecular proteins exquisitely preserved – stunning for a dinosaur millions of years old.

Until this Red Deer River dinosaur finding, coloration in dinosaurs had been “one of the mysteries surrounding the dinosaur.” Caleb Brown, leading author of the report published this August, focused on the coloration of the dinosaur. As Brown explains –

“Here we describe a new, exquisitely three-dimensionally preserved… Borealopelta markmitchelli…. [in] which… We identify melanin [a biomolecular protein] in the organic residues through mass spectroscopic analyses”

Jakob Vinther (pictured-left), an expert paleobiologist on coloration from University of Bristol, has studied the world’s best fossils for signs of skin biomolecules like pigments. After four days of delicately scraping, even he was astounded. The dinosaur is so well preserved that it “might have been walking around a couple of weeks ago,” Vinther explained in an interview with Gresko.

“I’ve never seen anything like this.”

The focus on coloration, however, side-steps the bigger questions posed by the fossil, including the issues of location and age. Vertebrate paleontologist Victoria Arbour at the Royal Ontario Museum in an interview with Greshko, noted

“There’s still a lot of healthy scientific skepticism around the interpretation of ancient biomolecules like pigments.”

Victoria’s skepticism stems from one big reason – the preservation of fragile proteins for millions of years draws into question the validity of the evolution industries fossil dating techniques, since the scientific evidence to support preservation of proteins for millions of years, simply does not exist. Evolution, not what they once said it should be.

Natural Selection Problem

Borealopelta markmitchelli is a new species, not a transitional link, nor does it have any known transitional links. That’s a big problem for the theory of evolution. Writing for the National Geographic, Greshko summarized the species status in the title of the article

“It’s Official: Stunning Fossil Is a New Dinosaur Species.”

Canada’s new fossil only compounds the industry’s persistent dilemma – no transitional links. Amazingly, the problem is not new to the evolution industry. Even Charles Darwin’s recognized the problem –

“Their [species] not being blended together by innumerable transitional links, is a very obvious difficulty.”

Transitional links were nowhere to be found in the Red Deer River Valley – just unlinked species. Darwin had envisioned natural selection acting to develop new species through “innumerable transitional links” with each link representing his “slight, successive changes.”

Natural selection theory hinges on eventually finding “innumerable” transitional links. Importantly, Darwin included a method to falsify this theory of natural selection –

“If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ exists which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.”

The glaring absence of transitional links is a blatant problem for Darwin’s theory of natural selection. Critics of Darwin’s theory are not hard to find. Suncor’s armored dinosaur discovery illustrates what Curator Emeritus at the American Museum of Natural History Niles Eldridge confided in 1995 –

“No wonder paleontologists shied away from evolution for so long. It never seemed to happen.”

No transitional links – no evolution. Niles’ colleague at Columbia University, Stephen Jay Gould (pictured-right) , who was awarded the Darwin-Wallace Medal in 2009, also emerged as one of the earliest evolution-insider critic –

“The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our ability even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates, in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for the gradualistic account of evolution.”

What the evolution industry desperately needs is evidence for transitions between species – certainly not more unlinked new species. New species with no known transitional links only compounds the agony of a dying theory.

Using Darwin’s own criteria, the theory of natural selection has been falsified once again, this time by Canada’s newest armored dinosaur fossil.

Evolution, not what they once said it should be.


This lone Red Deer Valley dinosaur points to the global flood Moses recorded in the Genesis account by not only falsifying evolution’s uniformitarian and millions of years theory, and decimates Darwin’s theory of natural selection.

Canada’s armored dinosaur should be studied in detail in schools and colleges. Evolution is not what they once said it was. Any guarantee of developing a cohesive theory of evolution has been decimated in a chaos of contradictions.

During the early twenty-first century, scientific advances have been progressively more brutal on the theory of evolution. A.N. Wilson, in his new book just released entitled “Charles Darwin, Victorian Mythmaker,” sides with the evolution critic movement –

““I soon came to realize, when I started my reading, that in fact there is no consensus among scientists about the theory of evolution.”

Albert Einstein, in an October 26, 1929 interview with the Saturday Evening Post said –

“As a child I received instruction both in the Bible and in the Talmud, I am a Jew, but I am enthralled by the luminous figure of the Nazarene. No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled with such life.”

Despite unprecedented challenges since the publication of The Origin of Species with more than 150 years of unparalleled endeavors in the history of science to prove otherwise, collective twenty-first century scientific evidence is best explained by the Genesis record written by Moses, undermining the theory of evolution.

Biological evolution exists only as a philosophy, not as a science.


18 Responses to “Evolution, Not What They Once Said”

  • Palmer:

    This article describes an unusual preservation occurrence of the remains of an ancient animal. It merely adds another detail to existing knowledge of the fossil record, and yet another confirmation that the ongoing speciation process appears to have been (often) an episodic mutation, rather than gradual adaptation.

  • Ken Wolgemuth:

    This new dinosaur has nothing to do with Noah’s Flood, which happened 4,000 to 10,000 years ago. The dinosaurs lived before 65 million years ago.
    Stephen Jay Gould was not at Columbia University. Get your facts straight.

  • The discovery could be viewed as under going speciation – if there were some evidences of transitional links. Since no transitional links are known, the case for speciation is not of scientific merit.

  • Since the evidence to support the preservation of molecular protein structures over millions of years does not exist, the 65 million year dating estimate cannot be scientific. Gould and Niles studied as colleagues at Columbia University at the same time in the mid-late 60’s.


    Indeed, “Gould graduated from Antioch College in 1963 and received a Ph.D. in paleontology at Columbia University in 1967. He joined the faculty of Harvard University in 1967, becoming a full professor there in 1973.” It really is LAUGHABLE how evolutionist love to pretend that THEY are the scientists! It’s a laugh a minute, dear Ken. Sorry, but it actually keeps me out of mischief discovering all the blunders of their pseudo-evo-science.
    See: http://www.britannica.com/biography/Stephen-Jay-Gould

    For an evolutionist of Gould’s stature to state, as he did, many times, that evolution’s best kept secret was the very problematic complete absence of the evidence of slow and gradual morpho-genetic change, is a strong and significant point in favour of the need for revision (at very least) of this most damnable, and appallingly deceptive streams of what is supposed to be science. Gould, otherwise a good scientist, felt he had to try to find a way around this problem so invented the idea of ‘punctuated equilibria’. It was a clever. But there is not the slightest evidence for it. The evolution industry, struggling ever since, but with new and expensive big boys’ toys at its disposal like molecular biologists’s labs, has told us that everything is “fine” as they now “know” that all the history of life can be traced “without doubt” in the DNA or families of organisms. Ha! It is all absolutely conjecture (a.ka.top quality baloney), and what the genetic evidence actually tells us is that the families of creatures that were once on the earth have largely become extinct, but have also (for those that have survived) diversified with very narrow limits. That is GOOD AND GREAT DESIGN by the Great Designer. The Creator of all that is.

  • Doug Priore:

    Ken Wolgemuth’s comment above shows an absolute commitment to his dogma, and how seriously he has been indoctrinated.

  • Vickie Rommel:

    How much longer is Science going to hold onto this belief of MILLIONS of years and evolution? With all of the world’s advancements in technology and such, one would think that real scientists would look at the evidence before them and admit they have been wrong. Why try to keep people in the dark? Not all of us are so gullible that we believe everything told to us. I am a creationist and believe that God made everything and set it all in place in literally six days. Although some creatures may not still be here, the kind is and they have not evolved into something other than what they were created to be, but have adapted to the region they are in.

  • While it may seem like “Science” is holding on to unverifiable beliefs, the real problem lies with “People” – not “Science.” As Jerry Coyne notes, evolution scientists are held captive by their funding and contractual agreements. Abandoning evolution would be a professional and financial disaster – fearing they are in too deep to get out. Ben Stein’s “Expelled” movie featured what happens we you step out of line from the dogma. Free-speech in the halls of education is essentially extinct.

    Pure “Science” though, revealing His secrets in nature- is always beautiful!

  • Jim Hill:

    Science 🔬 itself disproves the ‘Theroy of Evolution.’ Anyone familiar with the ‘The Laws of Thermodynamics,’ easily disproves it. If anyone is wanting more proof, go to rcg.org, and request the book on Evolution.

  • Bob Teufel:

    Regarding evidence for what can be called ‘particles to people evolution’, one essential proof is left glaringly un-demonstrated: One single physical model for this type of evolution. Demonstrate, since you proffer the idea of previously non existing structures coming into being, or, one structure changing into another structure, one physical model, not a conceptual model, a physical model. None exist.

  • Melinda French:

    Are there any pics of the entire creature?

  • No – during the extraction process, the integrity of the entire creature could not be maintained.

  • This does in fact prove evidence of the flood, although I’ve never needed evidence. They are very wrong about the dating of fossils. Jesus was here on earth a little over 2000 years ago. That’s why even scientists still use the time initials B.C. (before Christ). There’s is no possible way to estimate something that no-one was alive to prove. The Bible has proof that there were dinosaurs, but scientists, and those against God, want to try to push away the truth that the world is not as old as the they try to say. The earth is only thousands of years old, not millions or even billions. That’s foolishness. But that’s right; God has that in the Bible too, about foolish men who run after their own desires. This fossil is a rude awakening to many and they still want to contradict it. It’s very sad. Someone once said, “What if you’re wrong about God.” The answer, “Alright, lets say I am wrong, although I know I’m not. If I am wrong though, I have nothing to lose if we just die. If you’re wrong, you have everything to lose and will suffer eternity in everlasting fire. No thank you. I know my God is real. And I know Jesus was once on this earth.”
    One day, everyone will make an account of God, on that last day. This fossil is a beautiful reminder that He’s still in control, no matter what kind of brainwashing is done.

  • Keith Kemper:

    God created all things including dinosaurs and they were around in the Old Testament with men

  • So evolution doubters, what is the explanation why God created this creature to then go extinct?

  • Good question – thanks for asking. Extinction was not in God’s plan – man started the extinction plan.

    The explanation stems from what is known as “the fall” – this is how it goes: in the beginning, “God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it was very good” – everything was perfect. Man lived in harmony with dogs, dragons, and dinosaurs. However, after a period of time, Adam and Eve began to question the God. Their newly designed plan started by eating from a tree they were specifically told not to eat. Not a good idea. This started “the fall.”

    Since God is righteous and just, a just price must be paid for their rebellion. The price of “the fall” came in the form of a curse: “To Adam He said cursed is the ground… dust you are and to dust you will return.” Extinction is the result of Adam taking action against God’s word and has since been effecting every aspect of the universe – not just the dinosaurs. Even Stephen Hawking is predicting the end of life on Earth.

    To redeem man, Jesus will return and establish a new heaven and a new earth.

    At this Christmas time, it is interesting to recognize that for every prophesy about the birth of Jesus, there are 8 prophesies concerning Jesus’ return. If Jesus came the first time, we can be certain He will return and come again. Extinction will finally be only a distant memory – extinction will become extinct.

    Whether dinosaurs will be on the new earth is not known – the Bible is silent on this issue. However, since Jesus will be returning on a white horse, will be horses on the new earth – and probably dinosaurs, too. Life was perfect, and will once again be perfect as it was in the beginning. This has been called God’s redemption plan. Will – hope you are getting ready, too!

  • Dave Katz:

    Looking forward to your next post, Richard! Evolution is true, it’s just going in the wrong direction. Mutations, chance, and time remove genetic information, add new diseases, and wind down the world. Looking forward to your next post.

Leave a Reply

Book Description

Buy Now

Kindle Edition Available

Darwin, Then and Now is a journey through the most amazing story in the history of science - the history of evolution. The book encapsulates who Darwin was, what he said, and what scientists have discovered since the publication of The Origin of Species in 1859.

With over 1,000 references, Darwin Then and Now is a historical chronicle of the rise and fall of the once popular theory of biological evolution.