Darwin on Marx
Darwin had a significant influence on Karl Marx. Struggle and survival are central to Darwin’s theory of evolution. The full title of The Origin is –
On the Origin of Species by means of natural selection and the Survival of the Fittest in the Preservation of Favoured Races.
Darwin’s premise on survival and struggle in nature paralleled Karl Marx premise on class struggle. Marx summarized the importance of “struggle” in the first line of chapter one of The Communist Manifesto, published in 1848 -
“The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.”
Karl Heinrich Marx was born in Germany on May 5, 1818. In 1843, Marx moved to France, but ordered to leave by the French authorities after participating in an assassination attempt on Frederick William IV, King of Prussia in 1845. After a time in Belgium and Prussia, Marx and his new comrade, Friedrich Engels, finally settled in London, England in 1849.
By the time Marx had moved to London in 1849, Darwin had already moved his young family from London to the Down seven years earlier. Even though Down is located just sixteen miles from London, ironically they never met even though Darwin greatly influenced the works of Marx and Engels.
Marx and Engels immediately recognized the significance of Darwin’s theory. Within weeks of the publication of The Origin of Species in November 1859, Engels wrote to Marx -
“Darwin, by the way, whom I’m reading just now, is absolutely splendid. There was one aspect of teleology that had yet to be demolished, and that has now been done…. One does, of course, have to put up with the crude English method.”
Marx wrote back to Engels on December 19, 1860 -
“This is the book which contains the basis in natural history for our view.”
The Origin of Species became the natural cause basis for Marx’s emerging class struggle movement. In a letter to comrade Ferdinand Lassalle, on January 16, 1861, Marx wrote -
“Darwin’s book is very important and serves me as a basis in natural science for the class struggle in history.”
Marx inscribed “sincere admirer” in Darwin’s copy of Marx’s first volume of Das Kapital in 1867. The importance of the theory of evolution for Communism was critical. In Das Kapital, Marx wrote –
“Darwin has interested us in the history of Nature’s Technology, i.e., in the formation of the organs of plants and animals, which organs serve as instruments of production for sustaining life. Does not the history of the productive organs of man, of organs that are the material basis of all social organisation, deserve equal attention?”
To acknowledge Darwin’s influence, Marx asked to dedicate Das Kapital to Darwin. However, Darwin graciously replied -
“Dear sir; I thank you for the honor that you have done me by sending me your great work on Capital and I heartily wish that I was more worthy to receive it, but understanding more of the deep and important subject of political economy. Though our studies have been so different, I believe that we both earnestly desire the extension of knowledge and that this in the long run is sure to add to the happiness of Mankind. I remain, Dear Sir, Yours faithfully, Charles Darwin.”
At Karl Marx’s funeral in Highgate Cemetery in London, Engels spoke at Marx’s graveside March 1883 –
“Just as Darwin discovered the law of evolution in organic nature, so Marx discovered the law of evolution in human history”
The American researcher Conway Zirckle explains why the founders of Communism immediately accepted Darwin’s theory -
“Marx and Engels accepted evolution almost immediately after Darwin published The Origin of Species. Evolution, of course, was just what the founders of communism needed to explain how mankind could have come into being without the intervention of any supernatural force, and consequently it could be used to bolster the foundations of their materialistic philosophy.”
Darwin had an undeniable and profound influence on the works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in the development of Communism. Although not intended by Darwin, the effect of the theory of evolution emerged as the single most significant social engineering movement of the twentieth century.
Speculations run wild on what the twentieth century would have looked like without the theory of evolution and Karl Marx. What’s your speculation?



We are a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community. Your site provided us with valuable information to work on. You’ve done a formidable job and our whole community will be grateful to you.
I think that Darwin’s influence on communism, or specifically Marx, wasn’t all that important, it barely exists actually.
Darwin’s main influence was Malthus, whose ideas Marx simply abhorred. I think that more than seeing some “substance” in common with communism Marx just saw very superficial similarity of natural selection with “class struggle”. He even mentioned he favored other evolutionary theories in which progress is supposed to be something more important rather than accidental, and with some other features that were perheps likened with revolution I guess.
It’s quite funny that somehow Darwin’s ideas can be associated by some with political/economical theories that are exact opposites, communism, by some communists, and social-darwinism (which, notwithstanding “social” is directly opposed to socialism) by both some libertarians and even some communist-leaning biologists (or just creationists and anti-evolutionist quacks in general) who are critical of Darwin for one reason or another.
I think that if Darwin hadn’t published OTOOS, someone like Wallace would just have taken a similar role, even though perhaps “sharing” it a bit more with other theorists in the field. Perhaps these ideas wouldn’t have been accepted at the same rate, probably somewhat slower, but would eventually be accepted, more or less like the initial obscurity and eventual rediscovery and embrace of Mendel’s heredity.
All the political and economic theories that are supposedly influenced would probably come to existence regardless of the development of equivalent ideas on biology by someone else. There were communist ideas even before Marx, and even social darwinism wasn’t anything really new, only the label is (and it’s actually a far more recent “invention”, applied to history “a posteriori”; there were not, at that time, people who would label themselves or others as “social darwinists”, unlike “darwinism”, that really had its “darwinians”) I think that more than real influence what happens is just a desire to associate one own’s ideas with well accepted ideas of someone else, trying to give a scientific veneer to them.
[...] is indeed dependent on atheism to exist; both beliefs complement each [...]